Jim Melnyk: “The Currency of the Kingdom of Heaven”
One of my all-time favorite
stories is Charles Dickens’ work, A
Christmas Carol. No – I’m not going
to preach a Christmas sermon before the local stores can put up their Christmas
decorations. Dickens’ story goes far
beyond its Christmastide setting – and is a fitting tale for this Sunday’s
gospel lesson.
In the story we’re quickly
introduced to Ebenezer Scrooge – an angry, grasping, greedy man with a sharp as
flint tongue. Dickens doesn’t tell us
this, but I suspect Scrooge is an extremely unhappy person – a sad person – who
hides his grief with his anger and his isolation from all other humans. In the story we find several sources for his
grief. The harshest, perhaps, is never
having known his mother, who died in childbirth – his birth, and a father who
never forgave Scrooge – blaming him for that death.
Scrooge’s journey throughout
the story is as much a story about learning to forgive, and longing to be forgiven,
as it is about learning the meaning of Christmas – perhaps because one of the meanings behind what happens in the
Incarnation – one of them, mind you not the only reason, is forgiveness. Scrooge has to find a way to forgive those in
his past who have hurt him, accept the forgiveness of those he has wronged, and
even more important, learn how to forgive himself.
I am willing to bet that all
of us have struggled with the idea of forgiveness from time-to-time. Forgiving others…seeking forgiveness from
others…and perhaps hardest of all, forgiving ourselves. Forgiveness is not always easy. Perhaps it’s easier when there’s a heart-felt
apology offered – but not always. And
when no apology is forthcoming, well, then it’s even more of a challenge.
But before we get to today’s
lesson from Matthew’s gospel, we need to mention the teachings immediately
preceding what we hear this morning. Earlier
in the conversation Jesus tells his disciples the parable of the lost
sheep. The owner of the sheep will do
everything possible to find the one lost sheep.
There is a sense of unyielding desire on God’s part to include even
those who wander away.
However, in the portion we
heard read last Sunday, if you recall, Jesus seems to outline a three-step plan
of action that sounds more like a three-strike program. Let’s seek out that lost sheep – but within
reason, huh? The offender gets three
hearings: one-on-one, one-on-three, and then one-on-the whole community
gathered. If the offending person
doesn’t respond appropriately – that is, with repentance – then let them “be to
you as a Gentile and a tax collector.”
So perhaps Peter is a bit
confused when he comes to Jesus and asks, “Lord, if another member of the faith
community sins against me, how often should I forgive? As many as seven times?” Now, we might ask ourselves, how did Peter
come up with the number seven?
It’s certainly giving someone
more than a second chance. The number
seven is a mystical number in the Jewish tradition. It’s the number of creation – a number for
perfection. Peter’s offer is
symbolically an act of perfect generosity.
Jesus responds, “Not seven times, Peter, but rather seventy-seven
times!” I’m also willing to bet Peter’s
jaw hits the ground with that response from Jesus.
And we, for whom even giving
second chances can be a challenge, probably drop our jaws or simply scratch our
heads over that answer – better yet, we dismiss it as hyperbole and totally
unrealistic. After all, didn’t Jesus
just a few minutes before tell us if an offender refuses to listen, let them be
treated as a Gentile and a tax collector?
And certainly we know how conventional wisdom in Jesus’ cultural setting
treated Gentiles and tax collectors.
As with all too many
Christians today, those around Jesus
“would have thought ‘outcast’ when they heard the phrase ‘Gentiles and tax
collectors,’ [and would assume] Jesus himself would have been thinking [the
same thing].” Author and Episcopal
Priest Robert Farrar Capon calls this sort of thinking “a short stack of
half-baked waffles” (The Parables of
Grace).
“The first waffle,” according
to Capon, “is precisely the failure of this sort of [interpretation] to pay
attention to the context: Jesus has just finished talking about actively
seeking outcasts, not about giving them the boot” (ibid). “The other waffle,” according to Capon, “is
[the] failure to pay attention to who is talking: Jesus is not [your average
guy on the street – and he is not, by now, “an average Messiah either” (ibid). The outcast and the lost – the recalcitrant
sinners – are precisely among those whom Jesus tells us to seek out – they are
among those to whom we are called to proclaim Good News.
Capon believes Jesus is
stringing his disciples along in last week’s reading. In the end, he seems to be saying, if you
bind others to this three-strike rule, be aware that you’re binding yourself to
the same consequences. Don’t be too
quick trying to throw others out of the kingdom, lest you find yourselves
getting tossed as well!
The parable we hear at
the end of today’s gospel lesson follows, and in it Jesus teaches us that forgiveness
is the currency of the kingdom of heaven.
But the thing we all too often get caught up on is the massive debt
forgiven by the king. True, we’re
talking Bill Gates type money here – more money than that servant could
probably make in somewhere around 150 years of work – an absolutely unpayable
debt (Bill Brosend, Conversations with Scripture: The Parables). Certainly there is no obligation on the
king’s part to forgive the debt. Rather,
the king responds out of a deep sense of compassion – “the servant has to do
nothing more than ask for grace to get grace” – it is not something he receives
because of his manipulative and meaningless promise to repay his debt (Capon).
However, our focus should
be on the first servant’s exchange with his colleague, who owes the first
servant 100 denarii – or a little less than a third of a year’s wages. The first servant – who had just experienced
forgiveness of an absolutely unpayable debt – has the opportunity to pay it
forward, as the saying goes, and let his colleague off the hook. He just can’t do it. He totally forgets how close he came to life
in a dungeon, and goes as far as seizing his debtor by the throat before
sending him off to jail. If forgiveness
is the currency of the kingdom of heaven, this unforgiving servant seemingly
chooses to live a bankrupt life outside the kingdom’s boundary.
The parable is meant to
show us how hard it can be to forgive – even when we know in our hearts that
we, ourselves, have experienced forgiveness from both God and others in our
lives. Yet even then, we struggle. So, then, how do we do it? How do we find the currency to forgive,
especially when forgiveness seems impossible?
Trappist monk William
Meninger writes, “The most authentic sign we can give ourselves that we have
actually begun the process of forgiveness is our prayer.
This is true even if the
only prayer we can say is to ask to want to forgive. In the beginning it may be
too much for us even to pray for the person who hurt us. Perhaps all we can do
is to pray for ourselves—to pray that for our own sake we may begin the process
of forgiveness” (Synthesis Today, 9/12/2017).
However much we may
struggle with forgiveness in our lives, we can stand firm in the knowledge of
God’s love for us. Forgiveness is indeed
part of the currency of the kingdom of heaven.
The Good News is that God freely, graciously, and lovingly dispenses
that currency wherever and whenever it is needed. Since we are recipients of this currency, we
are free to share with others the deep sense of compassion that represents
forgiveness in the kingdom of heaven.
And that, my friends, is Good News, indeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment